-
Re: Battle of the Sexes [2] (Please read the rules)
I looked at the numbers and we got messed up after Holysocks posted before waiting for two people to post so removing those two times I saw and counting back ...
Jan 7, 2014 -
Re: Battle of the Sexes [2] (Please read the rules)
129. @Holysocks At the moment that would seem to be the case. Although I doubt you're the only one left, but you might be the only one on at the ...
Jan 7, 2014 -
Re: The University of Soul Extermination DT
@Craz I think I'll be able to join, but I probably will not be able to have my profile up before tomorrow night.
Jan 7, 2014 -
Re: Battle of the Sexes [2] (Please read the rules)
129
Jan 7, 2014 -
Re: Battle of the Sexes [2] (Please read the rules)
125
Jan 7, 2014 -
Re: Battle of the Sexes [2] (Please read the rules)
129
Jan 6, 2014 -
Re: Battle of the Sexes [2] (Please read the rules)
128
Jan 6, 2014 -
Re: Battle of the Sexes [2] (Please read the rules)
127.
Jan 6, 2014 -
Re: Battle of the Sexes [2] (Please read the rules)
130.
Jan 6, 2014 -
Re: Battle of the Sexes [2] (Please read the rules)
129. You can call it cheating, but the fact is we never cheated.
Jan 6, 2014 -
Re: Battle of the Sexes [2] (Please read the rules)
129. Exactly. It's just being persistent. We haven't cheated once.
Jan 6, 2014 -
Re: Battle of the Sexes [2] (Please read the rules)
126. We never cheated.
Jan 6, 2014 -
Re: Battle of the Sexes [2] (Please read the rules)
125
Jan 6, 2014 -
Re: Battle of the Sexes [2] (Please read the rules)
125
Jan 6, 2014 -
Re: Battle of the Sexes [2] (Please read the rules)
124. Yeah, it's fun to be in the hundreds. :D
Jan 6, 2014